From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:26:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote: allow "-t" with fetch mirrors
Message-ID: <4DDE7116.4070900@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110526151100.GA2881@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Am 5/26/2011 17:11, schrieb Jeff King:
> +	if (mirror && !(mirror & MIRROR_FETCH) && track.nr)
> +		die("specifying branches to track makes no sense with non-fetch mirrors");

Don't proliferate no double negation. How about:

+		die("specifying branches to track makes sense only with fetch mirrors");

?

-- Hannes