Re: [PATCH] clone: report check out for non-bare clones

From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date: May 12, 2010, 07:59 UTC
Message-ID: <4BEA5FE5.3060503@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vljbp994c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 12.05.2010 03:55:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
> 
>> In the case of a detached head, (null) is the branch name.
> 
> I think that depends on your particular libc implementation that helpfully
> makes printf("%s", NULL) not to at least dump core.

Sorry, I didn't know I can't rely on that. I'll change that if going this route (reporting check out) is desirable at all. Is it?

Michael