Re: git branch documentation improvements
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- May 7, 2010, 07:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4BE3BF2F.8050903@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <201005070024.41172.ahartmetz@gmail.com>
Am 5/7/2010 0:24, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz:
> The most significant change is renaming <start-point> (or is it > <startpoint>...) to <branch-head> because even I as a relative beginner know > that a branch is defined by its (movable) head, and <start-point> *does* > actually specify the new branch head if I'm not mistaken.
But what is wrong with "start-point"? It precisely conveys the meaning of the parameter.
-- Hannes