Re: git branch documentation improvements
- From
- Andreas Hartmetz <ahartmetz@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 8, 2010, 16:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201005081839.37790.ahartmetz@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4BE3BF2F.8050903@viscovery.net>
On Friday 07 May 2010 09:20:15 Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Am 5/7/2010 0:24, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz: > > The most significant change is renaming <start-point> (or is it > > <startpoint>...) to <branch-head> because even I as a relative beginner > > know that a branch is defined by its (movable) head, and <start-point> > > *does* actually specify the new branch head if I'm not mistaken. > > But what is wrong with "start-point"? It precisely conveys the meaning of > the parameter. >
Look at -f: as far as I understand it moves the branch *head*, so start-point is plain wrong. The "root" of the branch is not moved, or only moved indirectly (not sure if the latter is allowed).