From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 07:20:15 GMT
Subject: Re: git branch documentation improvements
Message-ID: <4BE3BF2F.8050903@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <201005070024.41172.ahartmetz@gmail.com>

Am 5/7/2010 0:24, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz:
> The most significant change is renaming <start-point> (or is it 
> <startpoint>...) to <branch-head> because even I as a relative beginner know 
> that a branch is defined by its (movable) head, and <start-point> *does* 
> actually specify the new branch head if I'm not mistaken.

But what is wrong with "start-point"? It precisely conveys the meaning of
the parameter.

-- Hannes