Re: [PATCH 3/8] archive: add a failure test wrt .gitattributes misreading

> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> "git archive" is used to create archives from a tree (or commit), so
>> it should not consult any .gitattributes files on working directory.
>>
>> It currently does,...
> 
> ...which _might_ be actively used as a _feature_ by people; I do not think
> it is a bad idea to have a mode of operation where it solely works with
> in-tree attributes ignoring the work tree ones, and I suspect we probably
> would want to make that the default, but "so it should not" is probably a
> bit too strong.
> 
> For example, an older version may record $Id$ with keyword expansion set
> in its in-tree .gitattributes, and you later found it to be a mistake and
> have removed it in the current version.  Re-exporting an older version
> with the current code wouldn't have $Id$ expanded, but with your patch it
> will.
> 
> A stronger example would be crlf conversion, I suppose, but the same "with
> the current code we can fix it up but after this patch we can't" worry
> applies.
> 
> So perhaps you may want to resurrect the current behaviour with a new
> option --fix-attributes, whose description would be "normally the command
> takes attributes settings from the tree being exported, but .gitattributes
> files in it may record wrong attributes you may want to fix while
> exporting.  With this option, corresponding .gitattributes files in the
> work tree will override the in-tree .gitattributes" or something like
> that.