Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce %<branch> as shortcut to the tracked branch

From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date: Mar 19, 2009, 14:52 UTC
Message-ID: <49C25C4A.2010202@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903182343580.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>

Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 18.03.2009 23:46:

Show 29 quoted lines

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>>> Suggested by Pasky.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>>
>> In the longer term who suggested matters much less than why such a 
>> feature is desirable, how it is used, and without it what is impossible 
>> and/or cumbersome.  What's the motivation behind this?
>>
>> You do not have to explain it to me, but you should explain it to the 
>> history that records this commit, and to the users who read doccos.
> 
> And that's not all... Documentation updates and tests for % and %<branch> 
> are missing, too.
> 
> My main motivation to make this patch was to see how fast I could come up 
> with something working that does not hurt my eyes.
> 
> But I do not have time to do more today: My main project as well as Git 
> got accepted into the Google Summer of Code program, so I am even more 
> swamped than usually.
> 
> So... if anybody feels like it, I would be very thankful for a proper 
> commit message, documentation and tests...

Just a quick note that I'm feeling like it... Though it seems this does not quite work with local branches, i.e. a branch created with

git checkout --track -b tracking tracked

with "tracked" being a local branch. I don't see why on first inspection of the code (branch.tracking.merge = refs/heads/tracked, so what), but maybe you will...

Michael