Re: [PATCH v4] Introduce %<branch> as shortcut to the tracked branch
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2009, 19:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090320193650.GA26934@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwsakgjie.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:02:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> A naïve question. > > Has nobody suggested to use a really illegal characters such as ':' > instead? After all, we are not talking something that you can use in > refspecs but another way to spell branch names.
But if this goes into dwim_ref, then won't it be usable for refspecs? Or even if it isn't, then imagine the user who doesn't know this and types
git push :foo
unwittingly deleting the remote "foo".
Yes, that is unlikely (since why would they push the tracking branch of foo?), but I don't think it makes sense to argue that it doesn't have confusing (and potentially dangerous) consequenses.
> Alternatively, '~master' may have a nice connotation that means "where > master calls its home".
I think that is quite clever and doesn't have any meaning for a revision specifier already. I like it.
-Peff