Re: [PATCH] Document and test the new % shotcut for the tracked branch
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2009, 11:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090320111656.GA8940@machine.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903201128380.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:31:31AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> I had it ready yesterday! But the real problem is not addressed by your
> patch, either: '%<branch>' is a legal branch name.
>
> I briefly considered <branch>^{tracked}, but
>
> - the ^{} codepath does not try to substitute branch _names_, so we'd have
> to duplicate that ^{} detection, and,
>
> - it is really cumbersome to write.We already have @{N} to do one branch-based substitution, so what about following this convention? Can't we have @{t}?
Petr "Pasky" Baudis