From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:13:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] chain kill signals for cleanup functions
Message-ID: <4982B68C.2070207@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090130075552.GA27716@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King schrieb:
> One fix would be to just "signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL)" at the top. But I
> think it makes the test cleaner to just switch to a more reliable
> signal. The patch would look something like what is below. But I need to
> know what exit code Windows generates for SIGTERM. Johannes?

The same as with SIGINT: 3.

-- Hannes