Show 33 quoted lines
> On Mar 28, 2022, at 9:00 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> "Des Preston via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> From: Des Preston <despreston@gmail.com>
>>
>> Update the worktree usage to show that the repair command can take
>> multiple paths.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Des Preston <despreston@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> builtin/worktree.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
>> index 8682ff4c417..498975c1fd9 100644
>> --- a/builtin/worktree.c
>> +++ b/builtin/worktree.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static const char * const worktree_usage[] = {
>> N_("git worktree move <worktree> <new-path>"),
>> N_("git worktree prune [<options>]"),
>> N_("git worktree remove [<options>] <worktree>"),
>> - N_("git worktree repair [<path>]"),
>> + N_("git worktree repair [<path>...]"),
>
> The fact that this line was introduced in [PATCH 1/2] and then
> needed to immediately be corrected with this patch means the
> previous patch was suboptimal and this patch is "oops, the last one
> was bad and here is a band-aid fix-up".
>
> Let's not do so. Instead, you are encouraged to pretend to be a
> more perfect developer who does not make unnecessary mistake ;-)
>