Re: git-push through git protocol

From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 22, 2007, 00:24 UTC
Message-ID: <46a038f90701211624y19e83999k291408764bccc645@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <17843.65339.528621.549961@lisa.zopyra.com>

On 1/22/07, Bill Lear <rael@zopyra.com> wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> On Monday, January 22, 2007 at 12:49:02 (+1300) Martin Langhoff writes:
> >On 1/22/07, Bill Lear <rael@zopyra.com> wrote:
> >> 2) we have run into problems
> >> with developers having different umasks ---
> >
> >This is a non-issue. Just do git-repo-config core.sharedrepository 1
> >on each repo.
>
> Does this have the same effect as 'git --bare init-db --shared'?
> If so, I thought that was the way we initialized our company repo,
> though our config file reads:
>
> [core]
>         repositoryformatversion = 0
>         filemode = true

You should check your repos, ours all have

[core]
        sharedrepository = true

which I manually set doing

  GIT_DIR=xx.git git-repo-config core.sharedrepository true

and the group is set to "git" which all our devs are part of. Works great.

WRT denyNonFastforwards -- even without that, git refuses to push if it's not a fast-forward. Maybe if I had the branch set to +headname. In any case, you have to try real hard to muck that up.

cheers