git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] Add --show-touched option to show "diff --git" line when contents are unchanged

From
Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
Date
Aug 7, 2007, 05:56 UTC
Message-ID
<46B80993.3080409@midwinter.com>
In-Reply-To
<alpine.LFD.0.999.0708062118190.5037@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> It's not that the old output is "useful" in itself, but it's important for 
> people to know that the index is clean. So I'd suggest just setting a flag 
> when the header isn't printed, and then printing out a single line at the 
> end about "git index not up-to-date" or something.
>   

Or even a count of the number of files whose index data is unclean. I'd be fine with that as a suffix to the diff output.

Show 6 quoted lines
> Doing a "git diff" cannot actually update the index (since it very much 
> has to work on a read-only setup too), which is why the index _stays_ 
> stale unless something is done (eg "git status") to refresh it. And it's 
> that stale index that continues to make for bad performance without any 
> indication of why that is a problem.
>   

I totally agree that there needs to be a way to tell if the index is clean or not. I do wonder if the default output of "git diff" is the right place for that information, but if the notification can be collapsed to a line or two (rather than the unbounded number of lines that it potentially outputs now) then that's probably good enough.

Actually, though this will probably make people roll their eyes, before this discussion I would have guessed that "git status" would be the command that would tell you the index was out of date, and that there'd be a separate command (say, "git update-index"?) that you could then use to sync things up again. The fact that "git status" is really "git update index a little bit then show status" was not something I expected; it presents itself as a query utility, not an update utility, so I would have expected it to be read-only. Its index-modifying behavior is not even hinted at in the documentation (a patch for which follows.)

-Steve
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Steven Grimm
Message 44 of 75 in “git-diff on touched files: bug or feature?”
  1. Matthieu MoyAug 1, 2007
  2. Junio C HamanoAug 1, 2007
  3. Alexandre JulliardAug 1, 2007
  4. Junio C HamanoAug 1, 2007
  5. Alexandre JulliardAug 1, 2007
  6. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  7. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  8. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  9. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  10. Jean-François VeilletteAug 2, 2007
  11. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  12. Steven GrimmAug 2, 2007
  13. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  14. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  15. J. Bruce FieldsAug 2, 2007
  16. Add --show-touched option to show "diff --git" line when contents are unchangedSteven Grimm, Aug 3, 2007
  17. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  18. Johannes SchindelinAug 3, 2007
  19. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  20. Matthieu MoyAug 3, 2007
  21. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  22. Matthieu MoyAug 3, 2007
  23. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  24. Matthieu MoyAug 5, 2007
  25. Johannes SchindelinAug 5, 2007
  26. Matthieu MoyAug 5, 2007
  27. Matthias LederhoferAug 6, 2007
  28. David KastrupAug 6, 2007
  29. David KastrupAug 6, 2007
  30. Matthieu MoyAug 6, 2007
  31. Junio C HamanoAug 6, 2007
  32. David KastrupAug 7, 2007
  33. J. Bruce FieldsAug 7, 2007
  34. Linus TorvaldsAug 7, 2007
  35. Junio C HamanoAug 7, 2007
  36. David KastrupAug 7, 2007
  37. Linus TorvaldsAug 8, 2007
  38. Junio C HamanoAug 8, 2007
  39. Johannes SchindelinAug 8, 2007
  40. Junio C HamanoAug 8, 2007
  41. David KastrupAug 8, 2007
  42. Johannes SchindelinAug 8, 2007
  43. Jakub NarebskiAug 8, 2007
  44. Steven GrimmAug 7, 2007
  45. Add a note about the index being updated by git-status in some casesSteven Grimm, Aug 7, 2007
  46. git-diff: Output a warning about stale files in the indexSteven Grimm, Aug 7, 2007
  47. Junio C HamanoAug 7, 2007
  48. git-diff: Output a warning about stale files in the indexSteven Grimm, Aug 7, 2007
  49. Junio C HamanoAug 7, 2007
  50. Steven GrimmAug 7, 2007
  51. Jakub NarebskiAug 7, 2007
  52. Junio C HamanoAug 11, 2007
  53. Linus TorvaldsAug 8, 2007
  54. Steven GrimmAug 7, 2007
  55. Matthieu MoyAug 7, 2007
  56. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2007
  57. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2007
  58. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2007
  59. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  60. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  61. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2007
  62. Jeff KingAug 3, 2007
  63. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  64. Jeff KingAug 3, 2007
  65. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  66. Shawn O. PearceAug 3, 2007
  67. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2007
  68. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  69. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  70. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  71. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  72. Matthieu MoyAug 2, 2007
  73. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007
  74. Joel ReedAug 2, 2007
  75. Johannes SchindelinAug 2, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.