Re: Recent issues
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@eudaptics.com>
- Date
- Jul 9, 2007, 10:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46920BDA.C1AC9F51@eudaptics.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <18065.65446.474822.436800@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > * gitk --left-right > > > > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > > Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705051524300.17381@woody.linux-foundation.org> > > From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> > > Message-ID: <7vabwifl23.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> > > > > Paulus? > > Looks mostly OK; I assume there's no possible downside to using git > log -v --pretty=raw rather than git rev-list?
In general, there is a big down-side, although I don't know if this particular case is affected: --pretty=raw prints the parents noted in the commit object, but not those from .git/info/grafts.
-- Hannes