From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@eudaptics.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:20:10 GMT
Subject: Re: Recent issues
Message-ID: <46920BDA.C1AC9F51@eudaptics.com>
In-Reply-To: <18065.65446.474822.436800@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

Paul Mackerras wrote:
> 
> Junio C Hamano writes:
> 
> > * gitk --left-right
> >
> >   From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> >   Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705051524300.17381@woody.linux-foundation.org>
> >   From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
> >   Message-ID: <7vabwifl23.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
> >
> > Paulus?
> 
> Looks mostly OK; I assume there's no possible downside to using git
> log -v --pretty=raw rather than git rev-list?

In general, there is a big down-side, although I don't know if this
particular case is affected: --pretty=raw prints the parents noted in
the commit object, but not those from .git/info/grafts.

-- Hannes