Show 34 quoted lines
> Hi!
>
> On 10/12/06, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
>> > Martin Waitz wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:20:09PM -0700, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
>> > > > > + if (it)
>> > > > > + return it * width / (it + width) + 1;
>> > > > > + else
>> > > > > + return 0;
>> > > > No conditional needed:
>> > > >
>> > > > return it * width / (it + width - 1)
>> > >
>> > > But then it would start scaling much earlier
>> > > (for width 10: at 2 instead of 4).
>> > > This is not bad per se, but different...
>> > >
>> >
>> > OK:
>> > return (it * width + (it + width)/2)) / (it + width - 1)
>> >
>> > Now it's back at 4. ;-)
>>
>> Sure, but at this point the original conditional is probably more
>> efficient.
>>
>
> Don't make me use
> return it * width / (it + width) + !!it;
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html