Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] *.[ch] *_INIT macros: use { 0 } for a "zero out" idiom
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- Date
- Sep 28, 2021, 01:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4516b271-c9ed-2413-67c9-a783119fc0dd@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87h7e5zgjw.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On 28/09/2021 01:25, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Show 51 quoted lines
>
> On Mon, Sep 27 2021, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 02:54:25PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>>> In C it isn't required to specify that all members of a struct are
>>> zero'd out to 0, NULL or '\0', just providing a "{ 0 }" will
>>> accomplish that.
>>>
>>> Let's also change code that provided N zero'd fields to just
>>> provide one, and change e.g. "{ NULL }" to "{ 0 }" for
>>> consistency. I.e. even if the first member is a pointer let's use "0"
>>> instead of "NULL". The point of using "0" consistently is to pick one,
>>> and to not have the reader wonder why we're not using the same pattern
>>> everywhere.
>>
>> I seem to recall we've had some linter complaints about using "0" to
>> initialize a pointer, but I think these days it's OK, per:
>>
>> - 1c96642326 (sparse: allow '{ 0 }' to be used without warnings,
>> 2020-05-22)
>>
>> and
>>
>> - https://lore.kernel.org/git/18bd6127-be72-b7b7-8e2a-17bbe7214a2e@ramsayjones.plus.com/
>>
>> I think this is a good step, as the long lists are unwieldy and difficult to
>> keep up to date without actually providing any readability or functional
>> value.
>
> [+CC Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>]
>
> It seems like we should just revert 1c96642326, looking at the history
> of sparse.git there's:
>
> - 537e3e2d (univ-init: conditionally accept { 0 } without warnings, 2020-05-18)
>
> Followed by git.git's 1c96642326 a few days later, but then in sparse.git:
>
> - 41f651b4 (univ-init: set default to -Wno-universal-initializer, 2020-05-29)
>
> I.e. a few days after the workaround in git.git the upstream repo
> changed the default. The 537e3e2d isn't in any release of sparse that
> 41f651b4 isn't in, they both first appeared in v0.6.2.
>
> So us having -Wno-universal-initializer only seems useful if you're
> using some old commit in sparse.git.
>
> Having written the above I found
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200530162432.a7fitzjc53hsn2ej@ltop.local/;
> i.e. sparse's maintainer pretty much saying the same thing.Yes, this has been on my TODO list pretty much since commit 41f651b4, but it wasn't a priority. ;-)
ATB, Ramsay Jones