Re: [PATCH] Improving HP-UX support
- From
Osipov, Michael <michael.osipov@siemens.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2019, 08:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <3cabed9e-3949-93cc-2c9c-500a9cd9d4cd@siemens.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87lfzggk1n.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
Hey there,
Am 2019-05-09 um 09:32 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > On Wed, May 08 2019, Osipov, Michael wrote: > >> Hi folks, > > Hi see Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to submit patches inline > instead of as attachments.
Do you want me to resend the configure.ac change as per wiki article? I can also create a PR on GitHub. I am happy with both as long as I don't have to retain the patch for myself only ;-)
> For the sha1dc change it seems trivially correct, but we import that > upstream project as-is, could you please submit a pull request at > https://github.com/cr-marcstevens/sha1collisiondetection then we can > update our version?
Sure thing, will do.
Show 27 quoted lines
>> diff -ur configure.ac configure.ac
>> --- configure.ac 2019-02-24 16:55:19 +0000
>> +++ configure.ac 2019-05-08 11:31:42 +0000
>> @@ -475,8 +475,18 @@
>> if test "$git_cv_ld_rpath" = "yes"; then
>> CC_LD_DYNPATH=-rpath
>> else
>> - CC_LD_DYNPATH=
>> - AC_MSG_WARN([linker does not support runtime path to dynamic libraries])
>> + AC_CACHE_CHECK([if linker supports -Wl,+b,], git_cv_ld_wl_b, [
>> + SAVE_LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"
>> + LDFLAGS="${SAVE_LDFLAGS} -Wl,+b,/"
>> + AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([], [])], [git_cv_ld_wl_b=yes], [git_cv_ld_wl_b=no])
>> + LDFLAGS="${SAVE_LDFLAGS}"
>> + ])
>> + if test "$git_cv_ld_wl_b" = "yes"; then
>> + CC_LD_DYNPATH=-Wl,+b,
>> + else
>> + CC_LD_DYNPATH=
>> + AC_MSG_WARN([linker does not support runtime path to dynamic libraries])
>> + fi
>> fi
>> fi
>> fi
>
> Do we want to also have something in config.mak.uname to always do this
> on HP/UX?I am not convinced by that. I wouldn't mix operating system with compiler settings. One could also use GCC on HP-UX. The one above is for HP aCC.
Show 12 quoted lines
>> /* Not under GCC-alike or glibc or *BSD or newlib or <processor whitelist> */ >> -#elif (defined(_AIX)) >> +#elif (defined(_AIX) || defined(__hpux)) > > Seems sane, and per my googling even though HP/UX now runs on > little-endian hardware it's always big-endian. But in this manual they > advice doing it at runtime with a TEST_ENDIAN() macro in sys/portal.h: > http://h20628.www2.hp.com/km-ext/kmcsdirect/emr_na-c01921401-1.pdf > > Is that something we need to worry about / support? E.g. in the > configure script? >
That'd be much more work to extend configure.ac for that because is a runtime check. Since there are no real products vailable on x86 for HP-UX I'd neglect that. Our HPE salesman told us that this will be available somewhere in the future. So, I think this is very good for now.
Michael