From: Osipov, Michael Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 08:09:40 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improving HP-UX support Message-ID: <3cabed9e-3949-93cc-2c9c-500a9cd9d4cd@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <87lfzggk1n.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Hey there, Am 2019-05-09 um 09:32 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason: > > On Wed, May 08 2019, Osipov, Michael wrote: > >> Hi folks, > > Hi see Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to submit patches inline > instead of as attachments. Do you want me to resend the configure.ac change as per wiki article? I can also create a PR on GitHub. I am happy with both as long as I don't have to retain the patch for myself only ;-) > For the sha1dc change it seems trivially correct, but we import that > upstream project as-is, could you please submit a pull request at > https://github.com/cr-marcstevens/sha1collisiondetection then we can > update our version? Sure thing, will do. >> diff -ur configure.ac configure.ac >> --- configure.ac 2019-02-24 16:55:19 +0000 >> +++ configure.ac 2019-05-08 11:31:42 +0000 >> @@ -475,8 +475,18 @@ >> if test "$git_cv_ld_rpath" = "yes"; then >> CC_LD_DYNPATH=-rpath >> else >> - CC_LD_DYNPATH= >> - AC_MSG_WARN([linker does not support runtime path to dynamic libraries]) >> + AC_CACHE_CHECK([if linker supports -Wl,+b,], git_cv_ld_wl_b, [ >> + SAVE_LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}" >> + LDFLAGS="${SAVE_LDFLAGS} -Wl,+b,/" >> + AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([], [])], [git_cv_ld_wl_b=yes], [git_cv_ld_wl_b=no]) >> + LDFLAGS="${SAVE_LDFLAGS}" >> + ]) >> + if test "$git_cv_ld_wl_b" = "yes"; then >> + CC_LD_DYNPATH=-Wl,+b, >> + else >> + CC_LD_DYNPATH= >> + AC_MSG_WARN([linker does not support runtime path to dynamic libraries]) >> + fi >> fi >> fi >> fi > > Do we want to also have something in config.mak.uname to always do this > on HP/UX? I am not convinced by that. I wouldn't mix operating system with compiler settings. One could also use GCC on HP-UX. The one above is for HP aCC. >> /* Not under GCC-alike or glibc or *BSD or newlib or */ >> -#elif (defined(_AIX)) >> +#elif (defined(_AIX) || defined(__hpux)) > > Seems sane, and per my googling even though HP/UX now runs on > little-endian hardware it's always big-endian. But in this manual they > advice doing it at runtime with a TEST_ENDIAN() macro in sys/portal.h: > http://h20628.www2.hp.com/km-ext/kmcsdirect/emr_na-c01921401-1.pdf > > Is that something we need to worry about / support? E.g. in the > configure script? > That'd be much more work to extend configure.ac for that because is a runtime check. Since there are no real products vailable on x86 for HP-UX I'd neglect that. Our HPE salesman told us that this will be available somewhere in the future. So, I think this is very good for now. Michael