Re: [PATCH 03/11] remote: fix a leak in query_matches_negative_refspec
On 11-jun-2023 23:17:32, Jeff King wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Rubén Justo wrote:
>
> > An interesting point to note is that while string_list_append() is used
> > in the first two cases described, string_list_append_nodup() is used in
> > the third. This seems to indicate an intention to delegate the
> > responsibility for freeing the string, to the string_list. As if the
> > string_list had been initialized with STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, i.e. the
> > strings are strdup()'d when added (except if the "_nodup" API is used)
> > and freed when cleared.
> >
> > Switching to STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP fixes the leak and probably is what we
> > wanted to do originally. Let's do it.
>
> Ah, clearing a NODUP string-list strikes again. :) I concur with your
Yes. "_nodup" with NODUP string_list, shows red flags, imo.
> reasoning here; switching it to DUP is the best fix.
Thank you for reviewing the change.