Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] worktree: add `relativeWorktrees` extension

From: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Date: Nov 22, 2024, 19:27 UTC
Message-ID: <3El2QMJvXAu8Y_znK4CRouDl7FPQLWczoqz3Fkwl8D44cLGctSw86pXw6B-uVKqf0-G99SMjSbHAYY0dTJVKs9VJLvDYlpC_kIaTqdRw2xU=@pm.me>
In-Reply-To: <e207382e-3e6d-477a-9a1d-48949df06160@gmail.com>

On Friday, November 22nd, 2024 at 10:44, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> On 20/11/2024 05:13, Caleb White wrote:
> > The extension would remain set. I was going to try and unset the
> > extension, but it is only safe to do that if all worktrees use absolute
> > (meaning they would all need to be checked) and I decided it wasn't that
> > important.
> 
> Yes, I don't think we need to do that just now
> 
> I suppose the check could be added in the `repair_worktrees()`
> 
> > function during `git worktree repair` if it is deemed important.
> 
> 
> That could be a nice addition in the future

I'm glad you think so too :), and I'll keep it in mind for the future.

Best,

Caleb