Re: [PATCH] name-rev: use generation numbers if available

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:10 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes:
>>
>>> Let's clarify. There are two versions of the test in this version:
>>>
>>> 1) test which enables commit graph and tests that it does the right behavior.
>>>
>>> 2) test which removes commit graph and tests that it behaves the old way.
>>>
>>>
>>> test (1) checks the flow with the commit graph enabled, and verifies that with a commit graph the new behavior is used. This test will fail if you revert the name-rev commit-graph support.
>>>
>>> test (2) always performs the way we don't like. (since we disable the commit graph and the new flow doesn't kick in) This is the test I think I will eliminate in the next revision.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will remove the 2nd test, since the first test covers the change
>>> in behavior just fine, and I think I agree we don't need to set
>>> in-stone the implementation without commit graph.
>>>
>>> I will also look at adding a test which performs a count of which
>>> revisions get inspected and makes sure that we actually are doing
>>> the optimization.
>>
>> Sounds like a sensible thing to do.
>>
>> In any case, in the current patch, #2 is not working in
>> linux-TEST-vars job at CI.  You can visit this URL
>>
>> https://github.com/git/git/runs/5400048732?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:68062
>>
>> while logged into your GitHub account for details.
> 
> Looks like this job sets all the TEST variables including
> GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1? The negative test passes because the commit
> graph is enforced on and we then succeed even though we were trying to
> test the negative case.
> 
> I'm going to remove that test in v3 anyways, so I don't think it is a
> big deal. However, I wonder is there some way to mark a test as
> explicitely "don't run if GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH is set"?