Re: [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: improve SPARSE_FLAGS customisation

> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
> 
>>> Thanks for a detailed and clear explanation here and in the cover
>>> letter.  I agree with the motivation and most of the things I see in
>>> this patch, but one thing that stands out at me is if we still want
>>> to += append to SP_EXTRA_FLAGS in target specific way.  Before this
>>> patch, because SPARSE_FLAGS was a dual use variable, it needed +=
>>> appending to it in these two places, but that rationale is gone with
>>> this patch.
>>
>> As Luc surmised, in his reply, my intention was that SP_EXTRA_FLAGS
>> should be used for any 'internal' settings (not just the target
>> specific settings), whereas SPARSE_FLAGS would now be used _only_ for
>> user customisation.
> 
> OK, if that is the case, then not using "+= append" on SP_EXTRA_FLAGS