Re: [Bug] for-each-ref: %(object) and %(type) unimplemented
- From
- Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 25, 2008, 19:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <237967ef0806251208u65c17652gc6091da98294f807@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080625161433.GA6612@sigill.intra.peff.net>
2008/6/25 Jeff King <peff@peff.net>:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:08:15PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > >> Since you seem to be testing for-each-ref, maybe it would make sense to >> put together a test script that exercises each of the atoms? > > Hmm. Actually, there is a test in t6300 that runs with each atom name. > Unfortunately, it doesn't bother actually checking the output for > sanity, so the fact that these atoms returned the empty string was > missed.
The documentation also says "tree" and "parent" should work (which they also don't).
-- Mikael Magnusson