From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:08:30 GMT
Subject: Re: [Bug] for-each-ref: %(object) and %(type) unimplemented
Message-ID: <237967ef0806251208u65c17652gc6091da98294f807@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080625161433.GA6612@sigill.intra.peff.net>

2008/6/25 Jeff King <peff@peff.net>:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:08:15PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> Since you seem to be testing for-each-ref, maybe it would make sense to
>> put together a test script that exercises each of the atoms?
>
> Hmm. Actually, there is a test in t6300 that runs with each atom name.
> Unfortunately, it doesn't bother actually checking the output for
> sanity, so the fact that these atoms returned the empty string was
> missed.

The documentation also says "tree" and "parent" should work (which they
also don't).

-- 
Mikael Magnusson