Re: Intensive rename detection
- From
Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 4, 2008, 06:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <216e54900811032202h5c82e3a9j30100e5b82f6a16a@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <216e54900811032119h4cb51327v2d85712acc444185@mail.gmail.com>
Hmmm.... actually on second run I am still getting the too many files warning. I put the [diff] section in a ~/.gitconfig file, a .gitconfig file in the root of my repo, and in the .git/config file, but none of them seem to get rid of the message.
I'm running git version 1.5.5.1015.g9d258
Is that too old for this removal of a file rename limit?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 54 quoted lines
> Awesome. Per Linus' tip, I just noticed at the top of a long list of > messages git said: > warning: too many files, skipping inexact rename detection > > So I added the config file change, and that did the trick. Thanks, everyone! > > Here's a related but slightly different question: I've been stashing > and unstashing in the midst of all these renames and refactoring, and > now I'm left with some files listed in git status 3 times. I > understand why this is, but I don't know the best way to proceed. Git > is telling me: > > $ git status | grep MessageBase > src/DotNetOAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs: needs merge > src/DotNetOAuth/OAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs: needs merge > src/DotNetOpenAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs: needs merge > # unmerged: src/DotNetOAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs > # unmerged: src/DotNetOAuth/OAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs > # unmerged: src/DotNetOpenAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs > > I want to end up with MessageBase.cs in > src/DotNetOpenAuth/OAuth/Messages/MessageBase.cs, which ironically is > none of these three. And the couple of lines that changed in the file > need to be merged. Only two of these listed files exist on disk. How > can I best leverage git to merge the two files on disk while moving it > to a new location? > >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Andrew Arnott wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm refactoring a library including renaming both files and >>> > directories. A few lines of each file are also changed, but they are >>> > substantially unchanged in content. I've done a git add to put all my >>> > changes into the index, but a git status shows that git only detected >>> > a few of the renames... most of them are delete-add operations. Is >>> > there anything I can do to help git recognize the rename so that >>> > history is preserved across this commit? >>> >>> How many renames do you have? Modern versions of git will do any number of >>> exact renames, but the (rather expensive) inexact rename detection has a >>> default limit of something fairly small. >>> >>> You could try adding >>> >>> [diff] >>> renamelimit=0 >>> >>> to your ~/.gitconfig file. It can be quite expensive though. >>> >>> Linus >> >