Re: Intensive rename detection
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 4, 2008, 04:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081104043133.GB31276@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811032021210.3419@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:22:34PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> How many renames do you have? Modern versions of git will do any number of > exact renames, but the (rather expensive) inexact rename detection has a > default limit of something fairly small.
I was about to say "git should have complained about turning off the requested rename detection", but I forgot that we silenced that warning except for merges.
Maybe it makes sense for "status" or a single "diff" (but definitely not "log", where it isn't even clear which diff caused it!). I dunno. I find it clutter for anything except a merge, but if that is in fact what is happening here, it might have produced one slightly less confused user.
-Peff