Re: Intensive rename detection

From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Nov 5, 2008, 03:22 UTC
Message-ID: <20081105032220.GE20907@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <216e54900811032236l5ae4bde5v16ab6519962e428f@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:36:42PM -0800, Andrew Arnott wrote:

> Yes, on git status.  I'm afraid I don't know how to look up the
> reference you gave.

Sorry, gmane is back up, so the link is:

  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99147

With that patch, and this one on top, "git status" should respect your rename limits (though I haven't tested it).

---

diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index c3a9cab..0b92ac3 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static void wt_status_print_updated(struct wt_status *s)
 	rev.diffopt.format_callback = wt_status_print_updated_cb;
 	rev.diffopt.format_callback_data = s;
 	rev.diffopt.detect_rename = 1;
-	rev.diffopt.rename_limit = 200;
 	rev.diffopt.break_opt = 0;
 	run_diff_index(&rev, 1);
 }

-Peff