git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] refs: sync loose refs to disk before committing them

From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 4, 2021, 13:14 UTC
Message-ID
<211104.86ilx8hwvi.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<dd65718814011eb93ccc4428f9882e0f025224a6.1636029491.git.ps@pks.im>
On Thu, Nov 04 2021, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
Show 52 quoted lines
> When writing loose refs, we first create a lockfile, write the new ref
> into that lockfile, close it and then rename the lockfile into place
> such that the actual update is atomic for that single ref. While this
> works as intended under normal circumstences, at GitLab we infrequently
> encounter corrupt loose refs in repositories after a machine encountered
> a hard reset. The corruption is always of the same type: the ref has
> been committed into place, but it is completely empty.
>
> The root cause of this is likely that we don't sync contents of the
> lockfile to disk before renaming it into place. As a result, it's not
> guaranteed that the contents are properly persisted and one may observe
> weird in-between states on hard resets. Quoting ext4 documentation [1]:
>
>     Many broken applications don't use fsync() when replacing existing
>     files via patterns such as fd =
>     open("foo.new")/write(fd,..)/close(fd)/ rename("foo.new", "foo"), or
>     worse yet, fd = open("foo", O_TRUNC)/write(fd,..)/close(fd). If
>     auto_da_alloc is enabled, ext4 will detect the replace-via-rename
>     and replace-via-truncate patterns and force that any delayed
>     allocation blocks are allocated such that at the next journal
>     commit, in the default data=ordered mode, the data blocks of the new
>     file are forced to disk before the rename() operation is committed.
>     This provides roughly the same level of guarantees as ext3, and
>     avoids the "zero-length" problem that can happen when a system
>     crashes before the delayed allocation blocks are forced to disk.
>
> This explicitly points out that one must call fsync(3P) before doing the
> rename(3P) call, or otherwise data may not be correctly persisted to
> disk.
>
> Fix this by always flushing refs to disk before committing them into
> place to avoid this class of corruption.
>
> [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> ---
>  refs/files-backend.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
> index 151b0056fe..06a3f0bdea 100644
> --- a/refs/files-backend.c
> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c
> @@ -1749,6 +1749,7 @@ static int write_ref_to_lockfile(struct ref_lock *lock,
>  	fd = get_lock_file_fd(&lock->lk);
>  	if (write_in_full(fd, oid_to_hex(oid), the_hash_algo->hexsz) < 0 ||
>  	    write_in_full(fd, &term, 1) < 0 ||
> +	    fsync(fd) < 0 ||
>  	    close_ref_gently(lock) < 0) {
>  		strbuf_addf(err,
>  			    "couldn't write '%s'", get_lock_file_path(&lock->lk));

Yeah, that really does seem like it's the cause of such zeroing out issues.

This has a semantic conflict with some other changes in flight, see:
    git log -p origin/master..origin/seen -- write-or-die.c

I.e. here you do want to not die, so fsync_or_die() doesn't make sense per-se, but in those changes that function has grown to mean fsync_with_configured_strategy_or_die().

Also we need the loop around fsync, see cccdfd22436 (fsync(): be prepared to see EINTR, 2021-06-04).

I think it would probably be best to create a git_fsync_fd() function which is non-fatal and has that config/while loop, and have fsync_or_die() be a "..or die()" wrapper around that, then you could call that git_fsync_fd() here.

On the change more generally there's some performance numbers quoted at, so re the recent discussions about fsync() performance I wonder how this changes things.

I've also noted in those threads recently that our overall use of fsync is quite, bad, and especially when it comes to assuming that we don't need to fsync dir entries, which we still don't do here.

The ext4 docs seem to suggest that this will be the right thing to do in either case, but I wonder if this won't increase the odds of corruption on some other fs's.

I.e. before we'd write() && rename() without the fsync(), so on systems that deferred fsync() until some global sync point we might have been able to rely on those happening atomically (although clearly not on others, e.g. ext4).

But now we'll fsync() the data explicitly, then do a rename(), but we don't fsync the dir entry, so per POSIX an external application can't rely on seeing that rename yet. Will that bite us still, but just in another way on some other systems?

1. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7433057/is-rename-without-fsync-safe
Previous: Patrick SteinhardtNext: Patrick Steinhardt
Message 2 of 34 in “refs: sync loose refs to disk before committing them”
  1. refs: sync loose refs to disk before committing themPatrick Steinhardt, Nov 4, 2021
  2. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNov 4, 2021
  3. Patrick SteinhardtNov 4, 2021
  4. Junio C HamanoNov 4, 2021
  5. Neeraj SinghNov 4, 2021
  6. Junio C HamanoNov 5, 2021
  7. Jeff KingNov 5, 2021
  8. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNov 5, 2021
  9. Jeff KingNov 5, 2021
  10. Jeff KingNov 5, 2021
  11. Jeff KingNov 5, 2021
  12. Johannes SchindelinNov 5, 2021
  13. Patrick SteinhardtNov 5, 2021
  14. Jeff KingNov 5, 2021
  15. Patrick SteinhardtNov 9, 2021
  16. Jeff KingNov 10, 2021
  17. Patrick SteinhardtNov 10, 2021
  18. 0/3 refs: sync loose refs to disk before committing themPatrick Steinhardt, Nov 10, 2021
  19. 1/3 wrapper: handle EINTR in `git_fsync()`Patrick Steinhardt, Nov 10, 2021
  20. Johannes SchindelinNov 10, 2021
  21. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNov 10, 2021
  22. 2/3 wrapper: provide function to sync directoriesPatrick Steinhardt, Nov 10, 2021
  23. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNov 10, 2021
  24. 3/3 refs: add configuration to enable flushing of refsPatrick Steinhardt, Nov 10, 2021
  25. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNov 10, 2021
  26. Neeraj SinghNov 10, 2021
  27. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNov 10, 2021
  28. Neeraj SinghNov 11, 2021
  29. Patrick SteinhardtNov 11, 2021
  30. Patrick SteinhardtNov 11, 2021
  31. Neeraj SinghNov 11, 2021
  32. Johannes SchindelinNov 10, 2021
  33. Jeff KingNov 10, 2021
  34. Patrick SteinhardtNov 11, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.