Re: [PATCH v2] test-lib: GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG enabled by default
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 10, 2024, 07:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20240710071621.GA2049772@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <d5c307e3-79c5-4795-838d-4a425b012ec0@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:30:13AM +0900, Rubén Justo wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> As we currently describe in t/README, it can happen that: > > Some tests run "git" (or "test-tool" etc.) without properly checking > the exit code, or git will invoke itself and fail to ferry the > abort() exit code to the original caller. > > Therefore, GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true is needed to be set to > capture all memory leaks triggered by our tests. > > It seems unnecessary to force users to remember this option, as > forgetting it could lead to missed memory leaks. > > We could solve the problem by setting GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG to > "true" by default, but that might suggest we think "false" makes sense, > which isn't the case. > > Therefore, the best approach is to remove the option entirely while > maintaining the capability to detect memory leaks in blind spots of our > tests.
Yeah, I think that reasoning makes sense.
Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/ci/lib.sh b/ci/lib.sh > index 814578ffc6..51f8f59a29 100755 > --- a/ci/lib.sh > +++ b/ci/lib.sh > @@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ linux-musl) > linux-leaks|linux-reftable-leaks) > export SANITIZE=leak > export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true > - export GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true > ;;
OK, we can drop this line snice it's now the default. Good.
Show 36 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/README b/t/README > index d9e0e07506..c2a732d59e 100644 > --- a/t/README > +++ b/t/README > @@ -382,33 +382,9 @@ mapping between "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" and > those tests that > pass under "SANITIZE=leak". This is especially useful when testing a > series that fixes various memory leaks with "git rebase -x". > > -GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true will log memory leaks to > -"test-results/$TEST_NAME.leak/trace.*" files. The logs include a > -"dedup_token" (see +"ASAN_OPTIONS=help=1 ./git") and other options to > -make logs +machine-readable. > - > -With GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true we'll look at the leak logs > -before exiting and exit on failure if the logs showed that we had a > -memory leak, even if the test itself would have otherwise passed. This > -allows us to catch e.g. missing &&-chaining. This is especially useful > -when combined with "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK", see below. > - > GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=check when combined with "--immediate" > will run to completion faster, and result in the same failing > tests. The only practical reason to run > -GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=check without "--immediate" is to > -combine it with "GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true". If we stop at the > -first failing test case our leak logs won't show subsequent leaks we > -might have run into. > - > -GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=(true|check) will not catch all memory > -leaks unless combined with GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true. Some tests > -run "git" (or "test-tool" etc.) without properly checking the exit > -code, or git will invoke itself and fail to ferry the abort() exit > -code to the original caller. When the two modes are combined we'll > -look at the "test-results/$TEST_NAME.leak/trace.*" files at the end of > -the test run to see if had memory leaks which the test itself didn't > -catch.
After this patch, the documentation seems to end abruptly with "The only practical reason to run". I think we need to either delete those lines, too, or complete the thought.
I do think they are saying something useful, which is: in "check" mode, you should always use "--immediate" since the point is just to find scripts which aren't labeled correctly. But I think that is true whether you are using the leak log or not. Your log will be incomplete, of course, if you used "--immediate", but the point is to see whether we find even one.
Show 18 quoted lines
> GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION=<n>, when set, makes 'protocol.version'
> default to n.
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index 79d3e0e7d9..942828c55d 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -1270,8 +1270,8 @@ check_test_results_san_file_ () {
> say "As TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true isn't set the above leak is 'ok'
> with GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=check" &&
> invert_exit_code=t
> else
> - say "With GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true our logs revealed a memory
> leak, exit non-zero!" &&
> - invert_exit_code=t
> + say "Our logs revealed a leak!" &&
> + test "$test_failure" != 0 || invert_exit_code=t
> fi
> }This adds back in the test_failure fix from 47c6d4dad2 (test-lib: fix GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG, 2024-06-30), but in a different way. I think we'd want to build on top, and then you just need to update the messages on either side of that final elif/else.
Show 17 quoted lines
> @@ -1555,28 +1555,28 @@ then > passes_sanitize_leak=t > fi > > - if test "$GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK" = "check" > + if test -z "$passes_sanitize_leak" && > + ! test "$GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK" = "check" && > + test_bool_env GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK false > then > - sanitize_leak_check=t > - if test -n "$invert_exit_code" > + skip_all="skipping $this_test under GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" > + test_done > + else > + if test "$GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK" = "check" > then > [...]
I'm not sure why we need to touch this block. The "if GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG" just below it I assumed would go away. But all of this has to do with "check" versus "true", etc? There might be new refactoring / simplification opportunities opened up by getting rid of the LEAK_LOG variable, but we should do those on top.
I guess what's happening is that you've rearranged it so that:
Show 5 quoted lines
> - if test_bool_env GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG false > - then > if ! mkdir -p "$TEST_RESULTS_SAN_DIR" > then > BAIL_OUT "cannot create $TEST_RESULTS_SAN_DIR"
...when this conditional goes away, the existing body is still in the "else". But even though it would make the diff noisy to reindent, I think we are better off doing so to make it clear what the actual change is.
Show 9 quoted lines
> @@ -1599,9 +1599,6 @@ elif test "$GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK" = "check" > || > test_bool_env GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK false > then > BAIL_OUT_ENV_NEEDS_SANITIZE_LEAK "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" > -elif test_bool_env GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG false > -then > - BAIL_OUT_ENV_NEEDS_SANITIZE_LEAK "GIT_TEST_SANITIZE_LEAK_LOG=true" > fi
OK, this final elif is responsible for complaining when you set LEAK_LOG but don't have an actual leak-checking build. But once it goes away, there's no need to complain. Makes sense.
-Peff