Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] making --set-upstream have default arguments
- From
Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 3, 2021, 16:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20211203160346.18221-1-chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <b9bfd60b-9e4e-caa6-9836-e0f0e984a997@iee.email>
Philip Oakley wrote:
> Can we protect the expectations of a user with a `pushDefault` setting?
Are you talking about 'push.default'? If so, then I think, the proposed change would not affect the working of 'push.default' (if the idea is implemented in the right way). I am adding tests to be sure about it.
> If the user has one set, then the upstream won't be where they push in a > triangular repo workflow.
Pardon me, I am unable to understand what you are trying to say. Could you please explain a little bit?
Thanks.