[PATCH v2 0/7] branch: --sort improvements
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 7, 2021, 09:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20210107095153.4753-1-avarab@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20210106100139.14651-1-avarab@gmail.com>
Addresses a comment Junio had on 3/5 in v1. Now there's leading patches moving the ref_sorting flags to a bitfield, which (agreeing with Junio) I think looks a bit better & should be more maintainable going forward.
While I was at it I squashed the 3/5 and 4/5 patches into one. It's less confusing to look at when we add the ref-filter.c sorting code in the same commit we're using it in. I also made the bitfield/xor checking/sanity BUG a bit less verbose & simpler to understand.
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (7): branch: change "--local" to "--list" in comment branch tests: add to --sort tests ref-filter: add braces to if/else if/else chain ref-filter: move "cmp_fn" assignment into "else if" arm ref-filter: move ref_sorting flags to a bitfield branch: sort detached HEAD based on a flag branch: show "HEAD detached" first under reverse sort
builtin/branch.c | 6 ++-- builtin/for-each-ref.c | 2 +- builtin/tag.c | 2 +- ref-filter.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- ref-filter.h | 13 ++++--- t/t3203-branch-output.sh | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- wt-status.c | 4 +-- wt-status.h | 2 -- 8 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Range-diff:
1: c74e75dea90 = 1: c74e75dea90 branch: change "--local" to "--list" in comment
2: 1fea125c7a6 = 2: 1fea125c7a6 branch tests: add to --sort tests
3: 11e6f274d2d < -: ----------- ref-filter: add a "detached_head_first" sorting option
-: ----------- > 3: 5cb44f0be40 ref-filter: add braces to if/else if/else chain
-: ----------- > 4: 3e26cebe545 ref-filter: move "cmp_fn" assignment into "else if" arm
-: ----------- > 5: ad598fdc87c ref-filter: move ref_sorting flags to a bitfield
4: faf9e23a13f ! 6: af0c884b506 branch: use the "detached_head_first" sorting option
@@ Metadata
Author: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
## Commit message ##
- branch: use the "detached_head_first" sorting option
+ branch: sort detached HEAD based on a flag
- Use the new ref_sorting_detached_head_first_all() sorting option in
- ref-filter.c to revert and amend 28438e84e04 (ref-filter: sort
- detached HEAD lines firstly, 2019-06-18).
+ Change the ref-filter sorting of detached HEAD to check the
+ FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD flag, instead of relying on the ref
+ description filled-in by get_head_description() to start with "(",
+ which in turn we expect to ASCII-sort before any other reference.
- In Chinese the fullwidth versions of punctuation like "()" are
- typically written as (U+FF08 fullwidth left parenthesis), (U+FF09
- fullwidth right parenthesis) instead. This form is used in both
- po/zh_{CN,TW}.po in most cases where "()" is translated in a string.
-
- In 28438e84e04 the ability to translate this as part of the "git
- branch -l" output was removed because we'd like the detached line to
- appear first at the start of "git branch -l", e.g.:
+ For context, we'd like the detached line to appear first at the start
+ of "git branch -l", e.g.:
$ git branch -l
* (HEAD detached at <hash>)
master
- Let's instead use the new ref_sorting_detached_head_first_all() in
- branch.c to say that we'd like these sorted before other entries.
+ This doesn't change that, but improves on a fix made in
+ 28438e84e04 (ref-filter: sort detached HEAD lines firstly, 2019-06-18)
+ and gives the Chinese translation the ability to use its preferred
+ punctuation marks again.
+
+ In Chinese the fullwidth versions of punctuation like "()" are
+ typically written as (U+FF08 fullwidth left parenthesis), (U+FF09
+ fullwidth right parenthesis) instead[1]. This form is used in both
+ po/zh_{CN,TW}.po in most cases where "()" is translated in a string.
+
+ Aside from that improvement to the Chinese translation, it also just
+ makes for cleaner code that we mark any special cases in the ref_array
+ we're sorting with flags and make the sort function aware of them,
+ instead of piggy-backing on the general-case of strcmp() doing the
+ right thing.
As seen in the amended tests this made reverse sorting a bit more
consistent. Before this we'd sometimes sort this message in the
- middle, now it's consistently at the beginning or end. Having it at
- the end doesn't make much sense either, but at least it behaves
- consistently now. A follow-up commit will make this behavior even
- better.
+ middle, now it's consistently at the beginning or end, depending on
+ whether we're doing a normal or reverse sort. Having it at the end
+ doesn't make much sense either, but at least it behaves consistently
+ now. A follow-up commit will make this behavior under reverse sorting
+ even better.
I'm removing the "TRANSLATORS" comments that were in the old code
while I'm at it. Those were added in d4919bb288e (ref-filter: move
@@ builtin/branch.c
@@ builtin/branch.c: int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
if (!sorting)
sorting = ref_default_sorting();
- ref_sorting_icase_all(sorting, icase);
-+ ref_sorting_detached_head_first_all(sorting, 1);
+ ref_sorting_set_sort_flags_all(sorting, REF_SORTING_ICASE, icase);
++ ref_sorting_set_sort_flags_all(
++ sorting, REF_SORTING_DETACHED_HEAD_FIRST, 1);
print_ref_list(&filter, sorting, &format);
print_columns(&output, colopts, NULL);
string_list_clear(&output, 0);
@@ ref-filter.c: char *get_head_description(void)
return strbuf_detach(&desc, NULL);
}
+@@ ref-filter.c: int filter_refs(struct ref_array *array, struct ref_filter *filter, unsigned int
+ return ret;
+ }
+
++static int compare_detached_head(struct ref_array_item *a, struct ref_array_item *b)
++{
++ if (!(a->kind ^ b->kind))
++ BUG("ref_kind_from_refname() should only mark one ref as HEAD");
++ if (a->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD)
++ return -1;
++ else if (b->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD)
++ return 1;
++ BUG("should have died in the xor check above");
++ return 0;
++}
++
+ static int cmp_ref_sorting(struct ref_sorting *s, struct ref_array_item *a, struct ref_array_item *b)
+ {
+ struct atom_value *va, *vb;
+@@ ref-filter.c: static int cmp_ref_sorting(struct ref_sorting *s, struct ref_array_item *a, stru
+ if (get_ref_atom_value(b, s->atom, &vb, &err))
+ die("%s", err.buf);
+ strbuf_release(&err);
+- if (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_VERSION) {
++ if (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_DETACHED_HEAD_FIRST &&
++ ((a->kind | b->kind) & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD)) {
++ cmp = compare_detached_head(a, b);
++ } else if (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_VERSION) {
+ cmp = versioncmp(va->s, vb->s);
+ } else if (cmp_type == FIELD_STR) {
+ int (*cmp_fn)(const char *, const char *);
+
+ ## ref-filter.h ##
+@@ ref-filter.h: struct ref_sorting {
+ REF_SORTING_REVERSE = 1<<0,
+ REF_SORTING_ICASE = 1<<1,
+ REF_SORTING_VERSION = 1<<2,
++ REF_SORTING_DETACHED_HEAD_FIRST = 1<<3,
+ } sort_flags;
+ };
+
## t/t3203-branch-output.sh ##
@@ t/t3203-branch-output.sh: test_expect_success 'git branch `--sort=[-]objectsize` option' '
5: b14a7b32cbf ! 7: 2497fffebf6 branch: show "HEAD detached" first under reverse sort
@@ ref-filter.c: static int cmp_ref_sorting(struct ref_sorting *s, struct ref_array
int cmp;
+ int cmp_detached_head = 0;
cmp_type cmp_type = used_atom[s->atom].type;
- int (*cmp_fn)(const char *, const char *);
struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
+
@@ ref-filter.c: static int cmp_ref_sorting(struct ref_sorting *s, struct ref_array_item *a, stru
- ^
- (b->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD))) {
+ if (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_DETACHED_HEAD_FIRST &&
+ ((a->kind | b->kind) & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD)) {
cmp = compare_detached_head(a, b);
+ cmp_detached_head = 1;
- } else if (s->version)
+ } else if (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_VERSION) {
cmp = versioncmp(va->s, vb->s);
- else if (cmp_type == FIELD_STR)
+ } else if (cmp_type == FIELD_STR) {
@@ ref-filter.c: static int cmp_ref_sorting(struct ref_sorting *s, struct ref_array_item *a, stru
cmp = 1;
}
-- return (s->reverse) ? -cmp : cmp;
-+ return (s->reverse && !cmp_detached_head) ? -cmp : cmp;
+- return (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_REVERSE) ? -cmp : cmp;
++ return (s->sort_flags & REF_SORTING_REVERSE && !cmp_detached_head)
++ ? -cmp : cmp;
}
static int compare_refs(const void *a_, const void *b_, void *ref_sorting)-- 2.29.2.222.g5d2a92d10f8