Re: [PATCH 00/28] Use main as default branch name
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 18, 2020, 02:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20201118024028.GE360414@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20201118012544.GC650959@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> IMHO, though, all of this is orthogonal to question of what the default > is. Unless we are thinking the basename thing would work as a default, > but I don't think that resolves any of the backwards-compatibility > concerns.
If we think it would make sense as the *eventual* default, we could use
[init] defaultBranchName =
(i.e., an empty string) to request it early.