Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] maintenance: take a lock on the objects directory
- From
- Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2020, 00:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200819000425.2840491-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <6f86cfaa94cfeaf7a2af417991ca07e41b6b0c3d.1597760589.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> If the lock file already exists, then fail silently. This will become
Maybe "skip all maintenance steps silently"?
Show 14 quoted lines
> + if (hold_lock_file_for_update(&lk, lock_path, LOCK_NO_DEREF) < 0) {
> + /*
> + * Another maintenance command is running.
> + *
> + * If --auto was provided, then it is likely due to a
> + * recursive process stack. Do not report an error in
> + * that case.
> + */
> + if (!opts->auto_flag && !opts->quiet)
> + error(_("lock file '%s' exists, skipping maintenance"),
> + lock_path);
> + free(lock_path);
> + return 0;
> + }As it is, this doesn't seem very silent. :-) If we do want a message to be printed maybe make it warning instead of error.
Other than that, the idea of having a lock file and the implementation in this patch look good to me.