Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Accommodate for pu having been renamed to seen
- From
Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 24, 2020, 15:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200624152409.GA143253@generichostname>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.668.v2.git.1593010120.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Hi Dscho,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:48:37PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Changes since v1: > > * Rebased onto master (no conflicts, so it is safe, and it is more robust > than basing the patches on seen which already contains v1 of these > patches).
Out of curiosity, why would we ever want to base any patches on `seen`? I understand there are some very rare edge-cases where it might be appropriate to base patches on `next` (where the series based on many, many other topics) but I'm not sure if I know of any situations where it'd make sense to base topics on `seen`.
Thanks,
Denton