Re: [alternative 0/10] fast-export: allow seeding the anonymized mapping
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:34:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Both of these techniques _could_ live side-by-side within fast-export,
> > as they have slightly different strengths and weaknesses. But I'd prefer
> > to just go with one (this one) in the name of simplicity, and I strongly
> > suspect nobody will ever ask for the other.
>
> OK. So should we revert the merge of the other one into 'next'?
> That is easy enough ;-)