Re: [PATCH] connected: always use partial clone optimization
- From
- Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2020, 03:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200330033247.27880-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqeetbawlx.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
> Sounds good. Jonathan? I've squashed Josh'es Reviewed-by, but I > will refrain from merging it to 'next' just yet to see if you too > like the proposed code structure.
I think that this is a local enough concern that going either way won't paint us into a corner, so if what's in jt/connectivity-check-optim-in-partial-clone is OK, I prefer using that to reduce churn.