From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 03:32:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] connected: always use partial clone optimization
Message-ID: <20200330033247.27880-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqeetbawlx.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

> Sounds good.  Jonathan?  I've squashed Josh'es Reviewed-by, but I
> will refrain from merging it to 'next' just yet to see if you too
> like the proposed code structure.

I think that this is a local enough concern that going either way won't
paint us into a corner, so if what's in
jt/connectivity-check-optim-in-partial-clone is OK, I prefer using that
to reduce churn.