[PATCH v3 1/2] submodule--helper: use C99 named initializer
- From
Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2020, 03:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200221031027.204486-2-emilyshaffer@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200221031027.204486-1-emilyshaffer@google.com>
Start using a named initializer list for SUBMODULE_UPDATE_CLONE_INIT, as the struct is becoming cumbersome for a typical struct initializer list.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> --- builtin/submodule--helper.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c index b6e4c79968..1737a91890 100644 --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c @@ -1586,10 +1586,13 @@ struct submodule_update_clone { int max_jobs; }; -#define SUBMODULE_UPDATE_CLONE_INIT {0, MODULE_LIST_INIT, 0, \ - SUBMODULE_UPDATE_STRATEGY_INIT, 0, 0, -1, STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, 0, 0, \ - NULL, NULL, NULL, \ - NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, 1} +#define SUBMODULE_UPDATE_CLONE_INIT { \ + .list = MODULE_LIST_INIT, \ + .update = SUBMODULE_UPDATE_STRATEGY_INIT, \ + .recommend_shallow = -1, \ + .references = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, \ + .max_jobs = 1 \ +} static void next_submodule_warn_missing(struct submodule_update_clone *suc,
-- 2.25.0.265.gbab2e86ba0-goog