Re: [RFE] Demilitarize Documentation (was RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure))

>  2) Any piece of software or technical tool is going to unavoidably need
>     to use some amount of jargon, or words that are lifted from a more
>     general vocabulary and intended to be understood in context.
> 
>     Thus, when we talk about e.g. "trees" in git, it's understood that
>     we're talking about something in the context of this software
>     project, trying to go by the first Google result of "tree" isn't
>     going to get you anywhere.
> 
> I for one thing those git-scm docs could be changed to eliminate those
> words for reasons entirely unrelated to them somehow being religious or
> militaristic. Specifically:
> 
>  * "blessed" is introduced in quotes and used twice. I think it would be
>    clearer to use "canonical" for what it's describing.
> 
>  * The docs already use "integration manager" and then introduce
>    "dictator" as a synonym in the context of explaining the workflow of
>    the kernel.
> 
>    They could instead use "main integrator" or something, since the
>    point of the example is to explain how git can be used to manage
>    distributed repositories that are integrated in a hierarchical
>    manner.