git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v2 28/33] merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renames

From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 20, 2017, 22:02 UTC
Message-ID
<20171120220209.15111-29-newren@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20171120220209.15111-1-newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
 merge-recursive.c                   | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 4b7ae37d14..6aed0f4b9d 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1138,6 +1138,26 @@ static int conflict_rename_dir(struct merge_options *o,
 {
 	const struct diff_filespec *dest = pair->two;
 
+	if (!o->call_depth && would_lose_untracked(dest->path)) {
+		char *alt_path = unique_path(o, dest->path, rename_branch);
+
+		output(o, 1, _("Error: Refusing to lose untracked file at %s; "
+			       "writing to %s instead."),
+		       dest->path, alt_path);
+		/*
+		 * Write the file in worktree at alt_path, but not in the
+		 * index.  Instead, write to dest->path for the index but
+		 * only at the higher appropriate stage.
+		 */
+		if (update_file(o, 0, &dest->oid, dest->mode, alt_path))
+			return -1;
+		free(alt_path);
+		return update_stages(o, dest->path, NULL,
+				     rename_branch == o->branch1 ? dest : NULL,
+				     rename_branch == o->branch1 ? NULL : dest);
+	}
+
+	/* Update dest->path both in index and in worktree */
 	if (update_file(o, 1, &dest->oid, dest->mode, dest->path))
 		return -1;
 	return 0;
@@ -1156,7 +1176,8 @@ static int handle_change_delete(struct merge_options *o,
 	const char *update_path = path;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth, 0)) {
+	if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth, 0) ||
+	    (!o->call_depth && would_lose_untracked(path))) {
 		update_path = alt_path = unique_path(o, path, change_branch);
 	}
 
@@ -1282,6 +1303,12 @@ static int handle_file(struct merge_options *o,
 			dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch);
 			output(o, 1, _("%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead"),
 			       rename->path, other_branch, dst_name);
+		} else if (!o->call_depth &&
+			   would_lose_untracked(rename->path)) {
+			dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch);
+			output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file at %s; "
+				       "adding as %s instead"),
+			       rename->path, dst_name);
 		}
 	}
 	if ((ret = update_file(o, 0, &rename->oid, rename->mode, dst_name)))
@@ -1407,7 +1434,18 @@ static int conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o,
 		char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch2);
 		output(o, 1, _("Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead"),
 		       a->path, new_path1, b->path, new_path2);
-		remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
+		if (would_lose_untracked(path))
+			/*
+			 * Only way we get here is if both renames were from
+			 * a directory rename AND user had an untracked file
+			 * at the location where both files end up after the
+			 * two directory renames.  See testcase 10d of t6043.
+			 */
+			output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file at "
+				       "%s, even though it's in the way."),
+			       path);
+		else
+			remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
 		ret = update_file(o, 0, &mfi_c1.oid, mfi_c1.mode, new_path1);
 		if (!ret)
 			ret = update_file(o, 0, &mfi_c2.oid, mfi_c2.mode,
diff --git a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
index 6efe7a45ec..915a920e1e 100755
--- a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
+++ b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
@@ -2871,7 +2871,7 @@ test_expect_success '10b-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
 	)
 '
 
-test_expect_failure '10b-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
+test_expect_success '10b-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
 	(
 		cd 10b &&
 
@@ -2942,7 +2942,7 @@ test_expect_success '10c-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)
 	)
 '
 
-test_expect_failure '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
+test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
 	(
 		cd 10c &&
 
@@ -3011,7 +3011,7 @@ test_expect_success '10d-setup: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
 	)
 '
 
-test_expect_failure '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+test_expect_success '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
 	(
 		cd 10d &&
 

-- 
2.15.0.309.g00c152f825
Previous: Elijah NewrenNext: Elijah Newren
Message 12 of 34 in “Add directory rename detection to git”
  1. 00/33 Add directory rename detection to gitElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  2. 04/33 directory rename detection: basic testcasesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  3. 06/33 directory rename detection: testcases to avoid taking detection too farElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  4. 24/33 merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & mergingElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  5. 22/33 merge-recursive: check for directory level conflictsElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  6. 25/33 merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new nameElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  7. 29/33 merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renamesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  8. 30/33 merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite casesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  9. 31/33 directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugsElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  10. 17/33 merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairsElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  11. 33/33 merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed fileElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  12. 28/33 merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renamesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  13. 18/33 merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obviousElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  14. 26/33 merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include treesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  15. 11/33 directory rename detection: testcases exploring possibly suboptimal mergesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  16. 32/33 merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renamesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  17. 21/33 merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames()Elijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  18. 10/33 directory rename detection: more involved edge/corner testcasesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  19. 27/33 merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renamesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  20. 23/33 merge-recursive: add a new hashmap for storing file collisionsElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  21. 20/33 merge-recursive: add a new hashmap for storing directory renamesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  22. 02/33 merge-recursive: fix logic ordering issueElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  23. 12/33 directory rename detection: miscellaneous testcases to complete coverageElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  24. 05/33 directory rename detection: directory splitting testcasesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  25. 19/33 merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairsElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  26. 15/33 merge-recursive: move the get_renames() functionElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  27. 16/33 merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logicElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  28. 13/33 directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting untracked filesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  29. 14/33 directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting dirty filesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  30. 03/33 merge-recursive: add explanation for src_entry and dst_entryElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  31. 01/33 Tighten and correct a few testcases for merging and cherry-pickingElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  32. 09/33 directory rename detection: testcases checking which side did the renameElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  33. 07/33 directory rename detection: partially renamed directory testcase/discussionElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017
  34. 08/33 directory rename detection: files/directories in the way of some renamesElijah Newren, Nov 20, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.