Re: [PATCH v2] builtin/log: honor log.decorate
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- May 13, 2017, 02:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170513024141.52nazwvnqsvj2af7@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170512234814.GG27400@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:48:14PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Hi, > > brian m. carlson wrote: > > > Does anyone else have views on whether this is good thing to test for? > > I know you don't mean to be rude, but this comes across as a bit of > a dismissive question.
Sorry, that wasn't my intention, but I see how it could have come off that way. I was trying to solicit other opinions, but did a bad job and implied yours wasn't valuable. I apologize.
Show 6 quoted lines
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:32:14PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > In my humble opinion, the bug being subtle makes it especially useful > to have a test that describes that bug. That way, if someone is > refactoring this code later then they know what to watch out for not > reintroducing.
Okay. I'll reroll with a patch to the tests. I agree that this is rather subtle.
-- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204