Re: [PATCH 11/20] refs: record the ref_store in ref_cache, not ref_dir
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2017, 17:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170320175145.zwfqp7varl4hwink@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <745f1ed3781083f99da31a33dec08f03bffa7d4f.1490026594.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:33:16PM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Instead of keeping a pointer to the ref_store in every ref_dir entry, > store it once in `struct ref_cache`, and change `struct ref_dir` to > include a pointer to its containing `ref_cache` instead. This makes it > easier to add to the information that is stored in `struct ref_cache` > without inflating the size of the individual entries.
This last sentence confused me. It's a pointer either way, no?
Do you just mean that we are free to add whatever we like to the "ref_cache" without polluting the "ref_store" that is a more public data structure?
-Peff