Re: [PATCH] real_path: make real_path thread-safe
On 12/07, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
>
> > But in any case it seems that e.g.
> > //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1/DIR2/..
> > must be converted into
> > //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1
> >
> > and
> > \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1\DIR2\..
> > must be converted into
> > \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1
>
> Additional questions that may be interesting are:
>
> //A/B/../C is it //A/C? is it an error?
> //A/B/../../C/D is it //C/D? is it an error?
>
Also is //.. the same as //? I would assume so since /.. is /
--
Brandon Williams