Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] ref-filter: use strbuf_split_str_omit_term()
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 17, 2016, 00:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160217003259.GD1187@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq37sskwo5.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:28:10PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:12:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> > To be honest, though, I am now on the fence, considering the possible > >> > whitespace issue. > >> > >> Certainly not having to see s[0]->buf over and over is a huge win ;-). > >> > >> Is the "whitespace issue" a big deal? Does it involve more than a > >> similar sibling to string_list_split() that trims the whitespace > >> around the delimiter (or allows a regexp as a delimiter "\s*,\s*")? > > > > I think that solution would work (and IMHO would actually be preferable > > to the split-then-trim that strbuf_split does). But it does mean writing > > new code. > > True, but only when we decide to support trimming the whitespace, > which can come later. > > I do not even know if it is wise to accept %(align:position=left, width=4) > when %(align:position=left,width=4) would do the job just fine.
Yeah, it was mostly just about being friendly to the user. But if nobody is complaining, it may not even be worth worrying about.
-Peff