Re: [PATCH 0/8] asciidoc fixups
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 15, 2015, 04:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150515040124.GA15942@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150515025223.GB4665@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:52:24AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Using Asciidoctor 1.5.0, it seems to work properly for me without > subs=normal. So perhaps we should just update the version used for the > site. I realize the Debian version is out of date; I've already filed a > bug.
I checked that it was broken on the site, but I didn't check to see how ancient the version there was. And it is rather old. I've opened a PR[1] to bump that.
> I opened issue 1344[0] for this. However, it looks like we can write
> <refname>@+++{+++<date>+++}+++ instead of <refname>@\{<date>\} and it
> will work correctly in both processors. That looks to be a workaround,
> as ugly and verbose as it is.Yeah, I guess that works. But man, is it ugly. I'd love it if we can get backslash-escaping in asciidoctor. Thanks for opening the issue.
-Peff
[1] https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/545