Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] the refs-transactions-reflog series
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 4, 2014, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20141204192720.GB16345@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79ka9swMKvYpSLC20kj0bj=QWS7syVDtQcOmuT5AC3SO+gw@mail.gmail.com>
Stefan Beller wrote:
> Ok, let's see how Michaels series evolves and if I can base the > transactions series > on that
That sounds good to me, too, FWIW. That way we don't have to fuss with conflicts in refs.c. :)
Thanks, Jonathan