From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:27:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] the refs-transactions-reflog series Message-ID: <20141204192720.GB16345@google.com> In-Reply-To: Stefan Beller wrote: > Ok, let's see how Michaels series evolves and if I can base the > transactions series > on that That sounds good to me, too, FWIW. That way we don't have to fuss with conflicts in refs.c. :) Thanks, Jonathan