Re: [PATCH 03/10] t4018: an infrastructure to test hunk headers
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 25, 2014, 21:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140325214232.GA18217@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <5331E1F6.1070506@kdbg.org>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Am 24.03.2014 22:39, schrieb Jeff King: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 05:36:59PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > >>> +How to write RIGHT test cases > >>> +============================= > >>> + > >>> +Insert the word "ChangeMe" (exactly this form) at a distance of > >>> +at least two lines from the line that must appear in the hunk header. > >> > >> The existing tests use -U1 to make writing cases simpler. Is there a > >> reason not to continue that (or if you found that porting the existing > >> cases was not a chore with -U3, I can buy that argument, too)? > > > > I take it back. You did keep "-U1" in the result. Is this "two lines" > > rule necessary, then? > > When we have > > one > two > three > > how would you describe the distance between "one" and "three"?
I read it as "two lines between". Though that would be appropriate for -U2, so I think I probably had an off-by-one in my head, then, too.
So it is probably fine as-is, and this was mostly just me confusing myself. Sorry for the noise.
-Peff