Re: [PATCH] general style: replaces memcmp() with proper starts_with()
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2014, 04:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140314045758.GA32748@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALs4jVHTBH3wTAQsv8+jb15Do1_oy0pcThsDL8ssE7fgrx5NxA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:33:50PM -0400, Quint Guvernator wrote:
> It is _not_ my goal to make the code harder to maintain down the road. > So, at this point, which hunks (if any) are worth patching?
This discussion ended up encompassing a lot of other related cleanups. I hope we didn't scare you away. :)
My understanding is that you were approaching this as a micro-project for GSoC. I'd love it if you want to pick up and run with some of the ideas discussed here. But as far as a microproject goes, I think it would make sense to identify one or two no-brainer improvement spots by hand, and submit a patch with just those (and I think Junio gave some good guidelines in his reply).
-Peff